↓ Skip to main content

「日本でのオピオイドクライシスを防ぐために」―製薬会社の立場から

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 106)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「日本でのオピオイドクライシスを防ぐために」―製薬会社の立場から
Published in
Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians, December 2021
DOI 10.11321/jjspc.21-0059
Authors

林 伸治, 高薄 敏史, 山口 重樹

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,011,672
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians
#2
of 106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,655
of 514,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 106 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them