| Title |
Avoidable intensive care unit resource use and costs of unvaccinated patients with COVID-19: a historical population-based cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12630-022-02299-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sean M. Bagshaw, Annalise Abbott, Sanjay Beesoon, Danny J. Zuege, Tracy Wasylak, Braden Manns, Thanh X. Nguyen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 833 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 372 | 45% |
| United States | 16 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | <1% |
| Panama | 5 | <1% |
| Comoros | 4 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Curaçao | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 2% |
| Unknown | 400 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 722 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 57 | 7% |
| Scientists | 37 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 17 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 456. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#62,425
of 26,033,965 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#4
of 2,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,958
of 437,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,033,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.