↓ Skip to main content

Protein disulfide isomerase as an antithrombotic target

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protein disulfide isomerase as an antithrombotic target
Published in
Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.tcm.2013.03.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Flaumenhaft

Abstract

Protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) is a ubiquitously expressed oxidoreductase required for proper protein folding. It is highly concentrated in the endoplasmic reticulum, but can also be released into the extracellular environment. Several in vivo thrombosis models have demonstrated that vascular PDI secreted by platelets and endothelial cells is essential for normal thrombus formation. Inhibition of extracellular PDI thus represents a potential strategy for antithrombotic therapy. Yet this approach requires the discovery of well-tolerated PDI inhibitors. A recent high-throughput screening identified the commonly ingested flavonoid, quercetin-3-rutinoside, as an inhibitor of PDI. Quercetin-3-rutinoside blocked thrombus formation at concentrations that are commonly ingested as nutritional supplements. The observation that a compound with Generally Recognized As Safe status inhibits PDI and blocks thrombosis in animal models forms a rationale for clinical trials evaluating PDI inhibitors as a new class of antithrombotics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Professor 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 18 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 25 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,293,767
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine
#103
of 826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,753
of 210,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.