Prevented Mortality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Historical and Projected Nuclear Power

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 8,491)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
18 blogs
twitter
680 tweeters
facebook
22 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
33 Google+ users
reddit
6 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevented Mortality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Historical and Projected Nuclear Power
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, March 2013
DOI 10.1021/es3051197
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pushker A. Kharecha, James E Hansen, Kharecha PA, Hansen JE, James E. Hansen

Abstract

In the aftermath of the March 2011 accident at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, the future contribution of nuclear power to the global energy supply has become somewhat uncertain. Because nuclear power is an abundant, low-carbon source of base-load power, it could make a large contribution to mitigation of global climate change and air pollution. Using historical production data, we calculate that global nuclear power has prevented an average of 1.84 million air pollution-related deaths and 64 gigatonnes of CO2-equivalent (GtCO2-eq) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that would have resulted from fossil fuel burning. On the basis of global projection data that take into account the effects of the Fukushima accident, we find that nuclear power could additionally prevent an average of 420,000-7.04 million deaths and 80-240 GtCO2-eq emissions due to fossil fuels by midcentury, depending on which fuel it replaces. By contrast, we assess that large-scale expansion of unconstrained natural gas use would not mitigate the climate problem and would cause far more deaths than expansion of nuclear power.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 680 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 5%
Germany 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 132 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 25%
Student > Master 33 21%
Student > Bachelor 28 18%
Researcher 24 15%
Other 10 6%
Other 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 39 25%
Environmental Science 20 13%
Chemistry 16 10%
Physics and Astronomy 15 10%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Other 54 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 924. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,648
of 7,425,528 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#3
of 8,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24
of 115,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#1
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,425,528 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.