↓ Skip to main content

Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
366 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004807.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veronica Pitt, Dianne Lowe, Sophie Hill, Megan Prictor, Sarah E Hetrick, Rebecca Ryan, Lynda Berends

Abstract

In mental health services, the past several decades has seen a slow but steady trend towards employment of past or present consumers of the service to work alongside mental health professionals in providing services. However the effects of this employment on clients (service recipients) and services has remained unclear.We conducted a systematic review of randomised trials assessing the effects of employing consumers of mental health services as providers of statutory mental health services to clients. In this review this role is called 'consumer-provider' and the term 'statutory mental health services' refers to public services, those required by statute or law, or public services involving statutory duties. The consumer-provider's role can encompass peer support, coaching, advocacy, case management or outreach, crisis worker or assertive community treatment worker, or providing social support programmes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 357 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 67 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 17%
Student > Master 62 17%
Student > Bachelor 31 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 8%
Other 63 17%
Unknown 51 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 83 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 80 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 15%
Social Sciences 42 11%
Computer Science 7 2%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 64 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#608,222
of 14,562,847 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,741
of 11,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,374
of 150,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,562,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.