↓ Skip to main content

Consumer‐providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
248 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
601 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consumer‐providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004807.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veronica Pitt, Dianne Lowe, Sophie Hill, Megan Prictor, Sarah E Hetrick, Rebecca Ryan, Lynda Berends

Abstract

In mental health services, the past several decades has seen a slow but steady trend towards employment of past or present consumers of the service to work alongside mental health professionals in providing services. However the effects of this employment on clients (service recipients) and services has remained unclear.We conducted a systematic review of randomised trials assessing the effects of employing consumers of mental health services as providers of statutory mental health services to clients. In this review this role is called 'consumer-provider' and the term 'statutory mental health services' refers to public services, those required by statute or law, or public services involving statutory duties. The consumer-provider's role can encompass peer support, coaching, advocacy, case management or outreach, crisis worker or assertive community treatment worker, or providing social support programmes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 601 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 592 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 90 15%
Researcher 89 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 13%
Student > Bachelor 52 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 45 7%
Other 94 16%
Unknown 150 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 19%
Psychology 106 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 80 13%
Social Sciences 62 10%
Computer Science 9 1%
Other 56 9%
Unknown 174 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,077,559
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,173
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,814
of 210,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.