↓ Skip to main content

A druggable UHRF1/DNMT1/GLI complex regulates Sonic hedgehog dependent tumor growth

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cancer Research, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A druggable UHRF1/DNMT1/GLI complex regulates Sonic hedgehog dependent tumor growth
Published in
Molecular Cancer Research, August 2022
DOI 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-22-0182
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fan Yang, Jezabel Rodriguez-Blanco, Jun Long, Marzena Swiderska-Syn, Daniel T. Wynn, Bin Li, Chen Shen, Anmada Nayak, Yuguang Ban, Xiaodian Sun, Robert K. Suter, Heather J. McCrea, Anthony J. Capobianco, Nagi G. Ayad, David J. Robbins

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2022.
All research outputs
#16,953,512
of 21,752,314 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cancer Research
#1,397
of 1,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,026
of 194,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cancer Research
#22
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,752,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.