↓ Skip to main content

Translational Biomedical Informatics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 8: Medical Imaging Informatics.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Medical Imaging Informatics.
Chapter number 8
Book title
Translational Biomedical Informatics
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-1503-8_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-101502-1, 978-9-81-101503-8
Authors

William Hsu Ph.D, Suzie El-Saden, Ricky K. Taira, William Hsu

Editors

Bairong Shen, Haixu Tang, Xiaoqian Jiang

Abstract

Imaging is one of the most important sources of clinically observable evidence that provides broad coverage, can provide insight on low-level scale properties, is noninvasive, has few side effects, and can be performed frequently. Thus, imaging data provides a viable observable that can facilitate the instantiation of a theoretical understanding of a disease for a particular patient context by connecting imaging findings to other biologic parameters in the model (e.g., genetic, molecular, symptoms, and patient survival). These connections can help inform their possible states and/or provide further coherent evidence. The field of radiomics is particularly dedicated to this task and seeks to extract quantifiable measures wherever possible. Example properties of investigation include genotype characterization, histopathology parameters, metabolite concentrations, vascular proliferation, necrosis, cellularity, and oxygenation. Important issues within the field include: signal calibration, spatial calibration, preprocessing methods (e.g., noise suppression, motion correction, and field bias correction), segmentation of target anatomic/pathologic entities, extraction of computed features, and inferencing methods connecting imaging features to biological states.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 112 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 31 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 16%
Engineering 18 15%
Physics and Astronomy 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 26 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2017.
All research outputs
#13,794,336
of 22,899,952 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,985
of 4,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,314
of 311,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#36
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,899,952 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.