↓ Skip to main content

The impact of diurnal variation on induced sputum cell counts in healthy adults

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of diurnal variation on induced sputum cell counts in healthy adults
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/2045-7022-3-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Warren J Davidson, Lisa E Wong, Stephanie The, Richard Leigh

Abstract

Induced sputum cell counts are a non-invasive, reliable method for evaluating the presence, type, and degree of inflammation in the airways of the lungs. Current reference values for induced sputum cell counts in healthy adults do not account for the effects of circadian rhythm, including diurnal variation. The objective of this study was to describe the diurnal variation in induced sputum cell counts, compared between early morning and late afternoon, in healthy adult individuals.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2013.
All research outputs
#5,984,018
of 11,344,729 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#227
of 337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,533
of 130,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,344,729 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.