↓ Skip to main content

Inhaled corticosteroids for subacute and chronic cough in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhaled corticosteroids for subacute and chronic cough in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009305.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate J Johnstone, Anne B Chang, Kwun M Fong, Rayleen V Bowman, Ian A Yang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 204 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 13%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Other 43 21%
Unknown 79 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 5%
Psychology 8 4%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 82 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,042,500
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,320
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,331
of 210,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.