Scientific investigation to look into the conservation history of a Tang Dynasty terracotta Dancing Horse
Heritage Science, August 2022
C. Conti, M. Catrambone, C. Colombo, E. Possenti, K. M. Rectenwald, M. Realini, P. Strobbia
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||60%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||1||20%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||20%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||20%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 206. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,138,997 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
of 455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 419,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,138,997 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.