↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

The Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire (BHPAQ): a valid internal structure of the instrument to assess healthy Brazilian adults

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire (BHPAQ): a valid internal structure of the instrument to assess healthy Brazilian adults
Published in
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, July 2022
DOI 10.1590/1806-9282.20211374
Pubmed ID
35946767
Authors

Daniel Santos Rocha, Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho, Jocassia Silva Pinheiro, Lisiane Fernanda Simeão de Azevedo, Angela Falcai, Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavarez, Adriana Sousa Rego, Gabriela Nascimento de Santana, Cid André Fidelis de Paula Gomes, Daniela Bassi-Dibai

Abstract

This study aimed to validate the internal structure of the Brazilian version of the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire. A cross-sectional study was conducted with individuals over 18 years old of both sexes, with Brazilian Portuguese as their native language. The structure of the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire was tested by confirmatory factor analysis. The model fit was evaluated by the following indices: root mean square error of approximation, comparative fit index, Tucker-Lewis index, standardized root mean square residual, and χ²/degrees of freedom. We used the Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion to compare different structures of the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire. A total of 241 individuals participated in this study. The original structure of the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire with 16 items and 3 domains was compared to a structure with 14 items and 3 domains. The internal structure of the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire with 14 items showed better fit indices and lower Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion values. The best internal structure of the Brazilian version of the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in adults presents 3 domains and 14 items.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Lecturer 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 29%
Unspecified 1 14%
Neuroscience 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#20,506,328
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#720
of 988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#350,685
of 437,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#19
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 988 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.