↓ Skip to main content

浮世草子における作者と代作者 : 多田南嶺論の(不)可能性(・)

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Literature, January 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 378)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
浮世草子における作者と代作者 : 多田南嶺論の(不)可能性(・)
Published in
Japanese Literature, January 1991
DOI 10.20620/nihonbungaku.40.1_25
Authors

高橋 明彦

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,972,887
of 25,463,724 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Literature
#34
of 378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,409
of 59,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Literature
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 378 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them