↓ Skip to main content

Teachers’ use of classroom assessment techniques in primary mathematics education—an explorative study with six Chinese teachers

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of STEM Education, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Teachers’ use of classroom assessment techniques in primary mathematics education—an explorative study with six Chinese teachers
Published in
International Journal of STEM Education, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40594-016-0051-2
Authors

Xiaoyan Zhao, Marja Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, Michiel Veldhuis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 7 19%
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Lecturer 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 10 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 15 42%
Unspecified 8 22%
Mathematics 6 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 5 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2016.
All research outputs
#6,707,962
of 11,341,809 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of STEM Education
#78
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,828
of 252,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of STEM Education
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,341,809 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.