The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Frequência e fatores associado à disfagia após acidente vascular cerebral
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CoDAS, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1590/2317-1782/20162015072 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aline Mansueto Mourão, Stela Maris Aguiar Lemos, Erica Oliveira Almeida, Laélia Cristina Caseiro Vicente, Antonio Lúcio Teixeira |
| Abstract |
To investigate the frequency of dysphagia in acute stroke and the possible associated clinical and sociodemographic features. A cross-sectional study was performed including 100 stroke patients who were admitted to the Minas Gerais Regional Public Hospital. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected, and the patients underwent clinical evaluation through the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS). The frequency of dysphagia was 50%, and most patients had severe swallowing disorders. Only a previous history of stroke was associated with dysphagia (p=0.02). Other sociodemographic and clinical variables were not associated with dysphagia, suggesting that the location and the pathophysiology of stroke did not influence its occurrence and severity. The frequency of dysphagia after stroke is high, being a previous stroke an important risk factor for subsequent stroke. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 31 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2017.
All research outputs
#21,157,205
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from CoDAS
#54
of 92 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,695
of 409,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CoDAS
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.