↓ Skip to main content

Using concept mapping in the development of the EU-PAD framework (EUropean-Physical Activity Determinants across the life course): a DEDIPAC-study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using concept mapping in the development of the EU-PAD framework (EUropean-Physical Activity Determinants across the life course): a DEDIPAC-study
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-3800-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giancarlo Condello, Fiona Chun Man Ling, Antonino Bianco, Sebastien Chastin, Greet Cardon, Donatella Ciarapica, Daniele Conte, Cristina Cortis, Marieke De Craemer, Andrea Di Blasio, Masar Gjaka, Sylvia Hansen, Michelle Holdsworth, Licia Iacoviello, Pascal Izzicupo, Lina Jaeschke, Liliana Leone, Livia Manoni, Cristina Menescardi, Silvia Migliaccio, Julie-Anne Nazare, Camille Perchoux, Caterina Pesce, Frank Pierik, Tobias Pischon, Angela Polito, Anna Puggina, Alessandra Sannella, Wolfgang Schlicht, Holger Schulz, Chantal Simon, Astrid Steinbrecher, Ciaran MacDonncha, Laura Capranica, on behalf of the DEDIPAC consortium

Abstract

A large proportion of European children, adults and older adults do not engage in sufficient physical activity (PA). Understanding individual and contextual factors associated with PA behaviours is essential for the identification and implementation of effective preventative environments, policies, and programmes that can promote an active lifestyle across life course and can potentially improve health. The current paper intends to provide 1) a multi-disciplinary, Pan-European and life course view of key determinants of PA behaviours and 2) a proposal of how these factors may cluster. After gathering a list of 183 potential PA behaviours-associated factors and a consensus meeting to unify/consolidate terminology, a concept mapping software was used to collate European experts' views of 106 identified factors for youth (<19 years), adults (19-64 years), and older adults (≥65 years). The analysis evaluated common trends in the clustering of factors and the ratings of the distinct factors' expected modifiability and population-level impact on PA behaviours across the life course. Priority for research was also assessed for each cluster. The concept mapping resulted in six distinct clusters, broadly merged in two themes: 1) the 'Person', which included clusters 'Intra-Personal Context and Wellbeing' and 'Family and Social Economic Status' (42 % of all factors) and 2) the 'Society', which included the remaining four clusters 'Policy and Provision', 'Cultural Context and Media', 'Social Support and Modelling', and 'Supportive Environment' (58 % of all factors). Overall, 25 factors were rated as the most impactful on PA behaviours across the life course and being the most modifiable. They were mostly situated in the 'Intra-Personal Context and Wellbeing' cluster. Furthermore, 16 of them were rated as top priority for research. The current framework provides a preliminary overview of factors which may account for PA behaviour across the life course and are most relevant to the European community. These insights could potentially be a foundation for future Pan-European research on how these factors might interact with each other, and assist policy makers to identify appropriate interventions to maximize PA behaviours and thus the health of European citizens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Unknown 195 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 16%
Researcher 29 15%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 52 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 27 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Social Sciences 18 9%
Psychology 12 6%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 66 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,684,968
of 25,366,663 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,399
of 17,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,277
of 320,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#48
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,366,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.