↓ Skip to main content

Contribution of Anomalous Circulation to the Early Onset of Baiu in Western Japan in 2021

Overview of attention for article published in SOLA : Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contribution of Anomalous Circulation to the Early Onset of Baiu in Western Japan in 2021
Published in
SOLA : Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere, January 2022
DOI 10.2151/sola.18a-004
Authors

Kazuto Takemura, Yoshihiro Nakae, Yoshihisa Fujihara, Hirotaka Sato, Hitoshi Sato, Atsushi Goto, Hiroaki Naoe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#14,206,722
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from SOLA : Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere
#258
of 352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,329
of 497,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SOLA : Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere
#31
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 497,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.