You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Caregiving-Related Work Productivity Loss Among Employed Family and Other Unpaid Caregivers of Older Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Value in Health (Elsevier Science), May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jval.2022.06.014 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maningbè B. Keita Fakeye, Laura J. Samuel, Emmanuel F. Drabo, Karen Bandeen-Roche, Jennifer L. Wolff |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 75% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 24% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2023.
All research outputs
#504,337
of 24,213,557 outputs
Outputs from Value in Health (Elsevier Science)
#33
of 4,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,869
of 386,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Value in Health (Elsevier Science)
#3
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,213,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.