↓ Skip to main content

Trigger factors mainly from the environmental type are reported by adolescents with migraine

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trigger factors mainly from the environmental type are reported by adolescents with migraine
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, March 2013
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20130023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcela Dalla Bernardina Fraga, Ricardo Silva Pinho, Solange Andreoni, Maria Sylvia de Souza Vitalle, Mauro Fisberg, Mario Fernando Prieto Peres, Luiz Celso Pereira Vilanova, Marcelo Rodrigues Masruha

Abstract

Migraine can be triggered by many factors such as stress, sleep, fasting and environmental causes. There are few studies that evaluated migraine trigger factors in the adolescent population. Methods: A total of 100 participants from 10 to 19 years were subjected to a detailed headache questionnaire, with demographic and clinical data, and a headache diary including trigger factors during a two-month period was asked. Results: Fifty of the participants exhibited chronic migraine and the other 50 participants demonstrated episodic migraine. The most common group of trigger factors reported was the environmental one, mainly sun/clarity, followed by hot weather and the smell of perfume. Conclusions: Ninety-one percent of children and adolescents with migraine reported a trigger factor precipitating the migraine attack.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sri Lanka 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 14 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 39%
Psychology 6 11%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2013.
All research outputs
#15,518,326
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#653
of 1,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,092
of 210,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.