You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An ethnomethodological approach to examine exploitation in the context of capacity, trust and experience of commercial surrogacy in India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1747-5341-8-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheela Saravanan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 23 | 24% |
| Psychology | 13 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2022.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#195
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,308
of 210,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.