↓ Skip to main content

Hormonal versus non-hormonal contraceptives in women with diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hormonal versus non-hormonal contraceptives in women with diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003990.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jantien Visser, Marieke Snel, Huib AAM Van Vliet

Abstract

Adequate contraceptive advice is important in both women with diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2 to reduce the risk of maternal and infant morbidity and mortality in unplanned pregnancies. A wide variety of contraceptives are available for these women. However, hormonal contraceptives might influence carbohydrate and lipid metabolism and increase micro- and macrovascular complications, so caution in selecting a contraceptive method is required.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 152 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 17%
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 34 22%
Unknown 19 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Social Sciences 12 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 25 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,688,805
of 14,552,460 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,527
of 10,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,130
of 150,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,552,460 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.