The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||9||82%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||9%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||5||15%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||4||12%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||7||21%|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||3||9%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||3||9%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,457,696 outputs
Outputs from One Health
of 515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 467,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from One Health
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,457,696 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.