You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
EyeVolve, a modular PYTHON based model for simulating developmental eye type diversification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcell.2022.964746 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryan Lavin, Shubham Rathore, Brian Bauer, Joe Disalvo, Nick Mosley, Evan Shearer, Zachary Elia, Tiffany A. Cook, Elke K. Buschbeck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2022.
All research outputs
#13,661,887
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#2,324
of 9,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,286
of 431,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#154
of 595 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,446 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 595 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.