You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure: a comprehensive meta-analysis of five randomised controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01429-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Muthiah Vaduganathan, Kieran F Docherty, Brian L Claggett, Pardeep S Jhund, Rudolf A de Boer, Adrian F Hernandez, Silvio E Inzucchi, Mikhail N Kosiborod, Carolyn S P Lam, Felipe Martinez, Sanjiv J Shah, Akshay S Desai, John J V McMurray, Scott D Solomon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 445 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 45 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 37 | 8% |
| Spain | 23 | 5% |
| Japan | 21 | 5% |
| Mexico | 16 | 4% |
| Argentina | 10 | 2% |
| Brazil | 8 | 2% |
| Colombia | 8 | 2% |
| France | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 83 | 19% |
| Unknown | 187 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 298 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 78 | 18% |
| Scientists | 58 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 266 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Researcher | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 18% |
| Unknown | 111 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 123 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 585. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#40,451
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#799
of 42,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,305
of 431,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#15
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.