↓ Skip to main content

Growth control of the eukaryote cell: a systems biology study in yeast.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biology, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
317 Mendeley
citeulike
20 CiteULike
connotea
7 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Growth control of the eukaryote cell: a systems biology study in yeast.
Published in
Journal of Biology, January 2007
DOI 10.1186/jbiol54
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan I Castrillo, Leo A Zeef, David C Hoyle, Nianshu Zhang, Andrew Hayes, David C J Gardner, Michael J Cornell, June Petty, Luke Hakes, Leanne Wardleworth, Bharat Rash, Marie Brown, Warwick B Dunn, David Broadhurst, Kerry O'Donoghue, Svenja S Hester, Tom P J Dunkley, Sarah R Hart, Neil Swainston, Peter Li, Simon J Gaskell, Norman W Paton, Kathryn S Lilley, Douglas B Kell, Stephen G Oliver, Castrillo JI, Zeef LA, Hoyle DC, Zhang N, Hayes A, Gardner DC, Cornell MJ, Petty J, Hakes L, Wardleworth L, Rash B, Brown M, Dunn WB, Broadhurst D, O'Donoghue K, Hester SS, Dunkley TP, Hart SR, Swainston N, Li P, Gaskell SJ, Paton NW, Lilley KS, Kell DB, Oliver SG, David CJ Gardner, Tom PJ Dunkley

Abstract

Cell growth underlies many key cellular and developmental processes, yet a limited number of studies have been carried out on cell-growth regulation. Comprehensive studies at the transcriptional, proteomic and metabolic levels under defined controlled conditions are currently lacking.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 3%
United Kingdom 8 3%
France 4 1%
Germany 4 1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Other 15 5%
Unknown 262 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 94 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 26%
Professor > Associate Professor 24 8%
Student > Master 21 7%
Student > Bachelor 19 6%
Other 65 21%
Unknown 13 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 207 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 14%
Engineering 14 4%
Chemistry 8 3%
Physics and Astronomy 7 2%
Other 18 6%
Unknown 20 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2013.
All research outputs
#366,566
of 6,357,079 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biology
#9
of 81 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#348,868
of 5,396,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biology
#9
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,357,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,396,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.