You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, November 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12910-016-0153-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mhairi Aitken, Jenna de St. Jorre, Claudia Pagliari, Ruth Jepson, Sarah Cunningham-Burley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 13 | 36% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Denmark | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Austria | 1 | 3% |
Comoros | 1 | 3% |
Finland | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 58% |
Scientists | 7 | 19% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 264 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 45 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 14% |
Student > Master | 36 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 4% |
Other | 45 | 17% |
Unknown | 78 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 45 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 6% |
Computer Science | 15 | 6% |
Psychology | 13 | 5% |
Other | 39 | 15% |
Unknown | 93 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#386,173
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#15
of 1,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,368
of 323,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.