↓ Skip to main content

Wear mechanism and life prediction of the ripper in a 9‐m‐diameter shield machine tunneling project of the Beijing new airport line in a sand‐pebble stratum

Overview of attention for article published in DEEP UNDERGROUND SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Wear mechanism and life prediction of the ripper in a 9‐m‐diameter shield machine tunneling project of the Beijing new airport line in a sand‐pebble stratum
Published in
DEEP UNDERGROUND SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, August 2022
DOI 10.1002/dug2.12010
Authors

Hua Jiang, Jiachen Zhu, Xiaoyan Zhang, Jinxun Zhang, Hongliang Li, Lingfeng Meng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,978,053
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from DEEP UNDERGROUND SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
#1
of 35 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,192
of 417,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from DEEP UNDERGROUND SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one scored the same or higher as 34 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them