↓ Skip to main content

Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
317 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
335 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2000
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002098
Authors

Rosemary Currell, Christine Urquhart, Paul Wainwright, Ruth Lewis, Currell, Rosemary, Urquhart, Christine, Wainwright, Paul, Lewis, Ruth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Spain 5 1%
Canada 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 307 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 85 25%
Researcher 57 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 16%
Student > Bachelor 31 9%
Student > Postgraduate 22 7%
Other 112 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 156 47%
Computer Science 37 11%
Unspecified 36 11%
Social Sciences 34 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 9%
Other 68 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,536,814
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,798
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,556
of 132,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.