↓ Skip to main content

Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
348 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
441 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2000
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002098
Authors

Rosemary Currell, Christine Urquhart, Paul Wainwright, Ruth Lewis, Currell, Rosemary, Urquhart, Christine, Wainwright, Paul, Lewis, Ruth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 441 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Spain 5 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 414 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 90 20%
Researcher 63 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 14%
Student > Bachelor 39 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 7%
Other 106 24%
Unknown 51 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 173 39%
Computer Science 38 9%
Social Sciences 37 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 8%
Psychology 18 4%
Other 65 15%
Unknown 75 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2014.
All research outputs
#4,034,204
of 16,849,755 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,431
of 11,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,190
of 158,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,849,755 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.