↓ Skip to main content

Reconstructing the ups and downs of primate brain evolution: implications for adaptive hypotheses and Homo floresiensis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reconstructing the ups and downs of primate brain evolution: implications for adaptive hypotheses and Homo floresiensis
Published in
BMC Biology, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-8-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen H Montgomery, Isabella Capellini, Robert A Barton, Nicholas I Mundy

Abstract

Brain size is a key adaptive trait. It is often assumed that increasing brain size was a general evolutionary trend in primates, yet recent fossil discoveries have documented brain size decreases in some lineages, raising the question of how general a trend there was for brains to increase in mass over evolutionary time. We present the first systematic phylogenetic analysis designed to answer this question.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 4%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Switzerland 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 174 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 22%
Researcher 42 21%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Master 23 12%
Professor 11 6%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 18 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102 51%
Social Sciences 15 8%
Psychology 13 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 6%
Arts and Humanities 9 5%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 23 12%