↓ Skip to main content

Phenology of the adult angel lichen moth (Cisthene angelus) in Grand Canyon, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Southwestern Naturalist, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phenology of the adult angel lichen moth (Cisthene angelus) in Grand Canyon, USA
Published in
Southwestern Naturalist, September 2016
DOI 10.1894/0038-4909-61.3.233
Authors

Anya N. Metcalfe, Theodore A. Kennedy, Jeffrey D. Muehlbauer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 60%
Environmental Science 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2016.
All research outputs
#4,392,752
of 8,619,738 outputs
Outputs from Southwestern Naturalist
#143
of 215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,814
of 242,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Southwestern Naturalist
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,619,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them