↓ Skip to main content

Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12984-016-0197-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura H. B. Huinink, Hanneke Bouwsema, Dick H. Plettenburg, Corry K. van der Sluis, Raoul M. Bongers

Abstract

Little is known about action-perception learning processes underlying prosthetic skills in body-powered prosthesis users. Body-powered prostheses are controlled through a harness connected by a cable that might provide for limited proprioceptive feedback. This study aims to test transfer of training basic tasks to functional tasks and to describe the changes over time in kinematics of basic tasks of novice body-powered prosthesis users. Thirty able-bodied participants and 17 controls participated in the study, using a body-powered prosthetic simulator. Participants in the training group were divided over four groups and practiced during a 2-week-period either direct grasping, indirect grasping, fixation, or a combination of these tasks. Deformable objects with different compliances had to be manipulated while kinematic variables and grip force control were assessed. Functional performance was measured with the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) prior to and after the training sessions, and after 2 weeks and 3 months retention. The control group only performed the SHAP tests. All four training groups and the control group improved on the SHAP, also after a period of non-use. Type of training had a small but significant influence on the improvements of the SHAP score. On a kinematic level movement times decreased and hook closing velocities increased over time. The indirect grasping group showed significantly shorter plateau times than the other training groups. Grip force control only improved a little over training. Training action-perception couplings of body-powered prosthesis in basic tasks transferred to functional tasks and this lasted after a period of non-use. During training movement times decreased and the indirect grasping group showed advantages. It is advisable to start body-powered training with indirect grasping tasks but also to practice hook-object orientations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 153 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Unspecified 16 10%
Researcher 14 9%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 41 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 44 29%
Unspecified 16 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 45 29%