You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Independent evolution of the specialized pharyngeal jaw apparatus in cichlid and labrid fishes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-7-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kohji Mabuchi, Masaki Miya, Yoichiro Azuma, Mutsumi Nishida |
| Abstract |
Fishes in the families Cichlidae and Labridae provide good probable examples of vertebrate adaptive radiations. Their spectacular trophic radiations have been widely assumed to be due to structural key innovation in pharyngeal jaw apparatus (PJA), but this idea has never been tested based on a reliable phylogeny. For the first step of evaluating the hypothesis, we investigated the phylogenetic positions of the components of the suborder Labroidei (including Pomacentridae and Embiotocidae in addition to Cichlidae and Labridae) within the Percomorpha, the most diversified (> 15,000 spp) crown clade of teleosts. We examined those based on 78 whole mitochondrial genome sequences (including 12 newly determined sequences) through partitioned Bayesian analyses with concatenated sequences (13,933 bp). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 246 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 23% |
| Researcher | 58 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 53 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 195 | 72% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 21 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,050,060
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#501
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,697
of 172,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.