↓ Skip to main content

Circulating Tumor and Immune Cells for Minimally Invasive Risk Stratification of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
36 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circulating Tumor and Immune Cells for Minimally Invasive Risk Stratification of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, September 2022
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-1594
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosalinda Termini, David Žihala, Evangelos Terpos, Albert Perez-Montaña, Tomáš Jelínek, Marc Raab, Niels Weinhold, Elias K. Mai, Anna Luise Grab, Jill Corre, Francois Vergez, Antonio Sacco, Marco Chiarini, Viviana Giustini, Alessandra Tucci, Sara Rodriguez, Cristina Moreno, Cristina Perez, Catarina Maia, Esperanza Martín-Sánchez, Camilla Guerrero, Cirino Botta, Juan-Jose Garces, Aitziber Lopez, Luis-Esteban Tamariz-Amador, Felipe Prosper, Joan Bargay, Maria-Elena Cabezudo, Enrique M. Ocio, Roman Hájek, Joaquin Martinez-Lopez, Fernando Solano, Rebeca Iglesias, Artur Paiva, Catarina Geraldes, Helena Vitoria, Clara Gomez, Felipe De Arriba, Heinz Ludwig, Antoni Garcia-Guiñon, Maria Casanova, Adrian Alegre, Valentin Cabañas, Maialen Sirvent, Albert Oriol, Javier de la Rubia, José-Ángel Hernández-Rivas, Luis Palomera, Maria Sarasa, Pablo Rios, Noemi Puig, Maria-Victoria Mateos, Juan Flores-Montero, Alberto Orfao, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Hervé Avet-Loiseau, Aldo M. Roccaro, Jesus F. San-Miguel, Bruno Paiva

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Librarian 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#898,550
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#610
of 12,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,750
of 431,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#19
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.