↓ Skip to main content

A disaggregated biodiversity offset accounting model to improve estimation of ecological equivalency and no net loss

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
A disaggregated biodiversity offset accounting model to improve estimation of ecological equivalency and no net loss
Published in
Biological Conservation, December 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.016
Authors

FJF Maseyk, LP Barea, RTT Stephens, HP Possingham, G Dutson, M Maron

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 4%
Brazil 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Unknown 43 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 23%
Researcher 10 21%
Other 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 22 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 21%
Unspecified 4 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 6 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2017.
All research outputs
#1,809,363
of 12,238,739 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,251
of 3,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,192
of 258,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#45
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,238,739 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.