↓ Skip to main content

Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, May 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
918 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
859 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere
Published in
Nature, May 2001
DOI 10.1038/35078064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ram Oren, David S. Ellsworth, Kurt H. Johnsen, Nathan Phillips, Brent E. Ewers, Chris Maier, Karina V.R. Schäfer, Heather McCarthy, George Hendrey, Steven G. McNulty, Gabriel G. Katul

Abstract

Northern mid-latitude forests are a large terrestrial carbon sink. Ignoring nutrient limitations, large increases in carbon sequestration from carbon dioxide (CO2) fertilization are expected in these forests. Yet, forests are usually relegated to sites of moderate to poor fertility, where tree growth is often limited by nutrient supply, in particular nitrogen. Here we present evidence that estimates of increases in carbon sequestration of forests, which is expected to partially compensate for increasing CO2 in the atmosphere, are unduly optimistic. In two forest experiments on maturing pines exposed to elevated atmospheric CO2, the CO2-induced biomass carbon increment without added nutrients was undetectable at a nutritionally poor site, and the stimulation at a nutritionally moderate site was transient, stabilizing at a marginal gain after three years. However, a large synergistic gain from higher CO2 and nutrients was detected with nutrients added. This gain was even larger at the poor site (threefold higher than the expected additive effect) than at the moderate site (twofold higher). Thus, fertility can restrain the response of wood carbon sequestration to increased atmospheric CO2. Assessment of future carbon sequestration should consider the limitations imposed by soil fertility, as well as interactions with nitrogen deposition.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 859 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 23 3%
Argentina 5 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Other 20 2%
Unknown 788 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 188 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 171 20%
Student > Master 100 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 70 8%
Student > Bachelor 63 7%
Other 164 19%
Unknown 103 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 263 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 262 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 105 12%
Engineering 18 2%
Social Sciences 14 2%
Other 47 5%
Unknown 150 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,493,046
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#38,237
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,060
of 43,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#44
of 348 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 348 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.