You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Overcoming the ‘self-limiting’ nature of QI: can we improve the quality of patient care while caring for staff?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015272 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca Lawton, Eric J Thomas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 225 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 93 | 41% |
| United States | 12 | 5% |
| Australia | 9 | 4% |
| Ireland | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 90 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 133 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 51 | 23% |
| Scientists | 39 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 27% |
| Other | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 27% |
| Psychology | 2 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 158. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2023.
All research outputs
#251,412
of 24,932,492 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#79
of 1,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,123
of 423,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,932,492 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.