↓ Skip to main content

Joint British Society consensus recommendations for magnetic resonance imaging for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices

Overview of attention for article published in Heart, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
241 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Joint British Society consensus recommendations for magnetic resonance imaging for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
Published in
Heart, September 2022
DOI 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320810
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anish Bhuva, Geoff Charles-Edwards, Jonathan Ashmore, Alexandra Lipton, Matthew Benbow, David Grainger, Trudie Lobban, Deepa Gopalan, Alistair Slade, Giles Roditi, Charlotte Manisty

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 241 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Professor 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 12 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 36%
Unspecified 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 15 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 163. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2024.
All research outputs
#269,575
of 26,434,713 outputs
Outputs from Heart
#132
of 6,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,329
of 440,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart
#7
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,434,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.