↓ Skip to main content

Long-term outcomes for patients treated for macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open Ophthalmology, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term outcomes for patients treated for macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review
Published in
BMJ Open Ophthalmology, June 2022
DOI 10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Hunter, Michael Williams

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2022.
All research outputs
#18,836,670
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Ophthalmology
#204
of 322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,651
of 442,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Ophthalmology
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.