You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Use of illicit and prescription drugs for cognitive or mood enhancement among surgeons
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-102 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andreas G Franke, Christiana Bagusat, Pavel Dietz, Isabell Hoffmann, Perikles Simon, Rolf Ulrich, Klaus Lieb |
Abstract |
Surgeons are usually exposed to high workloads leading to fatigue and stress. This not only increases the likelihood of mistakes during surgery but also puts pressure on surgeons to use drugs to counteract fatigue, distress, concentration deficits, burnout or symptoms of depression. The prevalence of surgeons taking pharmacological cognitive enhancement (CE) or mood enhancement (ME) drugs has not been systematically assessed so far. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 36% |
United States | 2 | 14% |
Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 215 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 40 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 35 | 16% |
Researcher | 23 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 8% |
Other | 48 | 22% |
Unknown | 36 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 29% |
Psychology | 35 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 4% |
Other | 47 | 21% |
Unknown | 43 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,009,963
of 24,212,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#702
of 3,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,557
of 202,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#24
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,212,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.