The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Are two-person checks more effective than one-person checks for safety critical tasks in high-consequence industries outside of healthcare? A systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Applied Ergonomics, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103906 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ryan D McMullan, Rachel Urwin, Mark Wiggins, Johanna I Westbrook |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 28% |
South Africa | 3 | 10% |
Australia | 3 | 10% |
United States | 2 | 7% |
Singapore | 1 | 3% |
New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 11 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 48% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 28% |
Scientists | 7 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 24% |
Professor | 2 | 12% |
Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
Researcher | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 24% |
Psychology | 2 | 12% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Design | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,086,923
of 26,604,138 outputs
Outputs from Applied Ergonomics
#141
of 1,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,422
of 442,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Ergonomics
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,604,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.