You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effectiveness of Epipharyngeal Abrasive Therapy on Chronic Epipharyngitis and the Exhaled Nitric Oxide Levels
|
---|---|
Published in |
Internal Medicine, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.2169/internalmedicine.9761-22 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Manabu Mogitate |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 27 | 26% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Slovakia | 1 | <1% |
Congo | 1 | <1% |
Solomon Islands | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 72 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 103 | 99% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#552,129
of 24,473,185 outputs
Outputs from Internal Medicine
#32
of 2,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,003
of 398,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal Medicine
#4
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,473,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.