↓ Skip to main content

Online Medical Professionalism: Patient and Public Relationships: Policy Statement From the American College of Physicians and the Federation of State Medical Boards

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Internal Medicine, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
406 tweeters
facebook
42 Facebook pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Online Medical Professionalism: Patient and Public Relationships: Policy Statement From the American College of Physicians and the Federation of State Medical Boards
Published in
Annals of Internal Medicine, April 2013
DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeanne M. Farnan

Abstract

User-created content and communications on Web-based applications, such as networking sites, media sharing sites, or blog platforms, have dramatically increased in popularity over the past several years, but there has been little policy or guidance on the best practices to inform standards for the professional conduct of physicians in the digital environment. Areas of specific concern include the use of such media for nonclinical purposes, implications for confidentiality, the use of social media in patient education, and how all of this affects the public's trust in physicians as patient-physician interactions extend into the digital environment. Opportunities afforded by online applications represent a new frontier in medicine as physicians and patients become more connected. This position paper from the American College of Physicians and the Federation of State Medical Boards examines and provides recommendations about the influence of social media on the patient-physician relationship, the role of these media in public perception of physician behaviors, and strategies for physician-physician communication that preserve confidentiality while best using these technologies.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 406 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Canada 3 2%
Japan 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Malaysia 2 1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 165 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 11%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 10%
Other 76 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Social Sciences 15 8%
Unspecified 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 24 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 409. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2018.
All research outputs
#23,524
of 13,216,984 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Internal Medicine
#155
of 10,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212
of 148,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Internal Medicine
#1
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,216,984 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.