↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of an In Situ Qualitative Debriefing Tool for Resuscitations

Overview of attention for article published in Resuscitation, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementation of an In Situ Qualitative Debriefing Tool for Resuscitations
Published in
Resuscitation, July 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.12.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul C. Mullan, Elizabeth Wuestner, Tarra D. Kerr, Daniel P. Christopher, Binita Patel

Abstract

Multiple guidelines recommend debriefing of resuscitations to improve clinical performance. We implemented a novel standardized debriefing program using a Debriefing In Situ Conversation after Emergent Resuscitation Now (DISCERN) tool.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 172 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 18%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 7%
Other 47 26%
Unknown 31 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 19%
Psychology 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 41 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#13,600,159
of 20,416,033 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#3,439
of 5,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,878
of 172,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#49
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,416,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.