You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002106.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason Wasiak, Heather Cleland, Fiona Campbell, Anneliese Spinks |
| Abstract |
An acute burn wound is a complex and evolving injury. Extensive burns produce systemic consequences, in addition to local tissue damage. Treatment of partial thickness burn wounds is directed towards promoting healing and a wide variety of dressings are currently available. Improvements in technology and advances in understanding of wound healing have driven the development of new dressings. Dressing selection should be based on their effects on healing, but ease of application and removal, dressing change requirements, cost and patient comfort should also be considered. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Mauritius | 1 | 13% |
| Singapore | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 546 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 529 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 12% |
| Researcher | 52 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 6% |
| Other | 123 | 23% |
| Unknown | 163 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 195 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 3% |
| Engineering | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 79 | 14% |
| Unknown | 184 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,249,815
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,687
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,025
of 210,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.