↓ Skip to main content

Dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 tweeters
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002106.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason Wasiak, Heather Cleland, Fiona Campbell, Anneliese Spinks

Abstract

An acute burn wound is a complex and evolving injury. Extensive burns produce systemic consequences, in addition to local tissue damage. Treatment of partial thickness burn wounds is directed towards promoting healing and a wide variety of dressings are currently available. Improvements in technology and advances in understanding of wound healing have driven the development of new dressings. Dressing selection should be based on their effects on healing, but ease of application and removal, dressing change requirements, cost and patient comfort should also be considered.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
Canada 3 1%
United States 3 1%
Germany 3 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 225 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 18%
Researcher 35 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 9%
Other 85 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 129 52%
Unspecified 34 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Psychology 9 4%
Other 44 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2019.
All research outputs
#708,713
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,176
of 8,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,267
of 144,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.