↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Randomized controlled trials in de-implementation research: a systematic scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
52 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Summary Blogs Twitter
Title
Randomized controlled trials in de-implementation research: a systematic scoping review
Published in
Implementation Science, October 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13012-022-01238-z
Pubmed ID
36183140
Authors

Aleksi J. Raudasoja, Petra Falkenbach, Robin W. M. Vernooij, Jussi M. J. Mustonen, Arnav Agarwal, Yoshitaka Aoki, Marco H. Blanker, Rufus Cartwright, Herney A. Garcia-Perdomo, Tuomas P. Kilpeläinen, Olli Lainiala, Tiina Lamberg, Olli P. O. Nevalainen, Eero Raittio, Patrick O. Richard, Philippe D. Violette, Jorma Komulainen, Raija Sipilä, Kari A. O. Tikkinen

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 8 36%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 8 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Psychology 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 3 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2023.
All research outputs
#988,158
of 23,803,225 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#165
of 1,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,536
of 442,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,803,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.