↓ Skip to main content

Randomized controlled trials in de-implementation research: a systematic scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
52 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Randomized controlled trials in de-implementation research: a systematic scoping review
Published in
Implementation Science, October 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13012-022-01238-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aleksi J. Raudasoja, Petra Falkenbach, Robin W. M. Vernooij, Jussi M. J. Mustonen, Arnav Agarwal, Yoshitaka Aoki, Marco H. Blanker, Rufus Cartwright, Herney A. Garcia-Perdomo, Tuomas P. Kilpeläinen, Olli Lainiala, Tiina Lamberg, Olli P. O. Nevalainen, Eero Raittio, Patrick O. Richard, Philippe D. Violette, Jorma Komulainen, Raija Sipilä, Kari A. O. Tikkinen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 12 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 14 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,113,469
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#175
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,808
of 441,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.