↓ Skip to main content

Mouse models of COVID-19 recapitulate inflammatory pathways rather than gene expression

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Pathogens, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Mouse models of COVID-19 recapitulate inflammatory pathways rather than gene expression
Published in
PLoS Pathogens, September 2022
DOI 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010867
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cameron R. Bishop, Troy Dumenil, Daniel J. Rawle, Thuy T. Le, Kexin Yan, Bing Tang, Gunter Hartel, Andreas Suhrbier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 18%
Computer Science 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 8 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,388,513
of 25,463,724 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Pathogens
#5,504
of 9,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,862
of 436,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Pathogens
#88
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.