↓ Skip to main content

Mouse models of COVID-19 recapitulate inflammatory pathways rather than gene expression

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Pathogens, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Mouse models of COVID-19 recapitulate inflammatory pathways rather than gene expression
Published in
PLoS Pathogens, September 2022
DOI 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010867
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cameron R. Bishop, Troy Dumenil, Daniel J. Rawle, Thuy T. Le, Kexin Yan, Bing Tang, Gunter Hartel, Andreas Suhrbier

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 14%
Computer Science 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,507,853
of 24,198,461 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Pathogens
#5,653
of 9,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,229
of 424,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Pathogens
#93
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,198,461 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.