| Title |
Lake Erie field trials to advance autonomous monitoring of cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2022.1021952 |
| Authors |
Paul A. Den Uyl, Luke R. Thompson, Reagan M. Errera, James M. Birch, Christina M. Preston, William Ussler, Colleen E. Yancey, Subba Rao Chaganti, Steven A. Ruberg, Gregory J. Doucette, Gregory J. Dick, Christopher A. Scholin, Kelly D. Goodwin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 30% |
| Researcher | 2 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 3 | 30% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,768,601
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#2,961
of 10,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,475
of 440,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#127
of 763 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 763 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.