↓ Skip to main content

The evolution of euhermaphroditism in caridean shrimps: a molecular perspective of sexual systems and systematics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The evolution of euhermaphroditism in caridean shrimps: a molecular perspective of sexual systems and systematics
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-10-297
Pubmed ID
Authors

G Curt Fiedler, Andrew L Rhyne, Ryoko Segawa, Tadashi Aotsuka, Nikolaos V Schizas

Abstract

The hippolytid genus Lysmata is characterized by simultaneous hermaphroditism, a very rare sexual system among Decapoda. Specialized cleaning behavior is reported in a few pair-living species; these life history traits vary within the genus. Unfortunately, the systematics of Lysmata and the Hippolytidae itself are in contention, making it difficult to examine these taxa for trends in life history traits. A phylogeny of Lysmata and related taxa is needed, to clarify their evolutionary relationships and the origin of their unique sexual pattern. In this study, we present a molecular phylogenetic analysis among species of Lysmata, related genera, and several putative hippolytids. The analysis is based upon DNA sequences of two genes, 16S mtDNA and nuclear 28S rRNA. Phylogenetic trees were estimated using Bayesian Inference, Maximum Likelihood, and Maximum Parsimony.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Indonesia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 55 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Master 10 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Other 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 78%
Environmental Science 5 8%
Computer Science 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2010.
All research outputs
#6,740,700
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,495
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,895
of 108,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#26
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.