↓ Skip to main content

How active and passive social media use affects impulse buying in Chinese college students? The roles of emotional responses, gender, materialism and self-control

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How active and passive social media use affects impulse buying in Chinese college students? The roles of emotional responses, gender, materialism and self-control
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1011337
Pubmed ID
Authors

Si Chen, Kuiyun Zhi, Yongjin Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 7 8%
Unspecified 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 51 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 16 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 9%
Unspecified 6 7%
Psychology 3 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 50 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,311,629
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,657
of 34,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,373
of 440,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#83
of 1,842 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,842 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.