↓ Skip to main content

High dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003142.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cindy Farquhar, Jane Marjoribanks, Russell Basser, Sarah E Hetrick, Anne Lethaby

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 58 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Master 13 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Other 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 50%
Unspecified 8 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Psychology 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 8 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,634,191
of 12,617,609 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,746
of 10,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,037
of 236,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,617,609 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.