↓ Skip to main content

Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12884-015-0504-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordan PR McIntyre, Kevin M Ellyett, Edwin A Mitchell, Gina M Quill, John MD Thompson, Alistair W Stewart, Robert N Doughty, Peter R Stone, the Maternal Sleep in Pregnancy Study Group

Abstract

Assessment of stroke volume (SV) is often necessary in clinical and research settings. The clinically established method for SV assessment in pregnancy is echocardiography, but given its limitations, it is not always an appropriate measurement tool. Thoracic impedance cardiography (ICG) allows continuous, non-invasive SV assessment. However, SV determination relies on assumptions regarding the thoracic shape that may mean the algorithm is not valid in pregnancy. The available data regarding the validity of ICG against an established reference standard using modern SV algorithms are both limited and conflicting. We aimed to test the validity of ICG in a clinically realistic setting in late pregnancy using echocardiography. Twenty-nine women in late pregnancy underwent standard echocardiography assessments with simultaneous ICG measurement. Agreement between devices was tested using Bland-Altman analysis. Bland-Altman analysis of the relationship between ICG and echocardiography demonstrated that the 95% limits of agreement exceeded acceptable or expected ranges. Measures of maternal and fetal anthropometry do not account for the lack of agreement. Absolute values of SV as determined by ICG are not valid in pregnancy. Further work is required to examine the ability of ICG to assess relative changes in maternal haemodynamics in late pregnancy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Engineering 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 29%